Should You Do LinkedIn or Cold Email First? Here’s How to Decide

One of the biggest mistakes founders and sales teams make is treating LinkedIn and cold email like they’re interchangeable. They’re not. Both are powerful outbound channels, but they work in different ways, at different speeds, and with different expectations from buyers.

The truth? Whether you should start with LinkedIn or email depends on three things: your market, your message, and your goals.

Why the order matters

Buyers are bombarded every day. Executives in SaaS, manufacturing, and professional services get dozens of cold emails daily. Some also get endless connection requests on LinkedIn. The order in which you reach out determines whether you feel like another spammer — or like someone worth listening to.

Think of it like dating: walking up to someone in person vs. sending them a text. The sequence changes the context.

When LinkedIn should come first

LinkedIn shines when trust and familiarity matter. Prospects can see your photo, role, mutual connections, and posts. That makes you feel more real compared to another faceless cold email.

• High-trust industries: Consulting, financial services, cybersecurity, or anything where credibility is key.
• Expensive or complex products: The higher the ticket, the more buyers want to “know” who’s reaching out.
• Engaged buyers: If your ICP is posting, commenting, or hiring on LinkedIn, start there.

👉 Example sequence: Comment on their posts twice → send a connection request → follow up with a short message. Now, when you email later, you’re not just “random@domain.com” - you’re the person they already saw on LinkedIn.

When cold email should come first

Email still wins when you need speed and scale. Unlike LinkedIn, you’re not limited by connection caps or daily invite limits. You can send hundreds of targeted emails a week, test messaging, and optimize campaigns based on real reply data.

• Clear ICP & pain point: If you know exactly who to target and what they care about, email lets you hit volume fast.
• Unengaged buyers: Some decision-makers don’t live on LinkedIn. Think manufacturing directors, IT heads in legacy industries, or certain enterprise roles.
• Testing messaging: Email is the fastest way to A/B test subject lines, pain points, and offers.

👉 Example sequence: Send a short 3-step cold email campaign → if no reply, view their LinkedIn profile and drop a connection request mentioning the email.

Why the best teams mix both

The real winners in 2025 aren’t choosing one over the other. They’re orchestrating sequences that use LinkedIn and email together.

• Start with LinkedIn for familiarity → follow up with an email so you’re not a stranger in the inbox.
• Start with email for volume → follow up on LinkedIn for a softer touch.

This combo works because people need multiple touchpoints before responding. Research shows most prospects require 5–7 touches before engaging. When those touches come across channels, reply rates jump.

How to decide for your team

Ask yourself three questions:

1. Where do my buyers live? Check if your ICP is active on LinkedIn (posting, commenting) or not.
2. Do I need speed or trust? Email = faster scale, LinkedIn = higher familiarity.
3. What resources do I have? Do you have someone posting/commenting consistently? Or do you have verified data and good email deliverability?

Your answers decide which channel deserves the first touch.

Final Thought

Outbound in 2025 isn’t about blasting one channel until it breaks. It’s about sequencing touches in the right order. If you need trust, start on LinkedIn. If you need speed, start with cold email. But don’t silo them. Used together, LinkedIn and email create a flywheel that turns strangers into booked meetings.

‍