As a SimOps platform, how to reach VP Director Head level personas and book meetings

‍Who this is for

Founders and revenue leaders at SimOps platforms who need meetings with senior R and D decision makers in Europe and the United Kingdom.

The buyer in 1 minute

• VP sets strategy and budgets. Cares about risk, readiness, and total cost of decision making

• Director owns delivery. Cares about cycle time, bottlenecks, and resource use

• Head leads a program or function. Cares about test counts, energy use, and audit trails

Pain signals you can speak to

• Physical testing eats time and budget

• Modelling and simulation live in silos and miss ERP and PLM constraints

• Design of experiments is slow and dependent on a few experts

• Decisions are not auditable across programs and suppliers

• Security and compliance slow every new tool

Positioning in 1 line

Operate your existing models with real world data, run faster trade off studies, reduce physical tests, and keep decisions auditable.

Proof you can state without naming clients

• SOC two Type two compliance

• Selection for respected accelerators and consortia

• References to regulated environments where security and governance matter

First touch rules

• One outcome per message

• One proof that is easy to verify

• One very small ask for a fifteen minute mapping call

Copy you can reuse

Subject ideas

• Reduce physical tests in program name this quarter

• Faster design of experiments with your current models

• Use ERP and PLM data to improve engineering decisions

Email opener

Name

A short idea to reduce physical tests in program name without slowing validation. We connect existing modelling and simulation to ERP and PLM so engineering decisions use real constraints. Two outcomes we can discuss energy reduction and faster trade off studies with built in optimisation. Open to a fifteen minute mapping chat next week

Call opener

Thanks for taking the call. Teams like yours usually want 2 things first fewer physical tests without losing rigour and second faster design of experiments using the data you already have. If either is on your roadmap I can walk you through a short workflow that runs on your current stack.

LinkedIn opener

Appreciated your post on design of experiments. We help R and D teams run DoE with existing models and data then share it as a simple app for non specialists. If that is relevant for your program happy to compare notes.

Sequenced outreach example

Day 1

• Email one outcome plus one proof plus small ask

• LinkedIn follow connect with a one line note that repeats the outcome

Day 3

• Call with a thirty second program specific opener and a voicemail that repeats the small ask

Day 7

• Reply to your own email with a one line update and a slot suggestion

Day 10

• Send a two image workflow sketch or a two minute screen capture that shows the decision path

Objections and answers

Security review will take months

• We run inside your current environment and reuse your identity and access rules. Happy to share a two page security brief first.

We already have modelling and simulation tools

• We connect what you already use and add ERP and PLM context so decisions reflect real constraints. No rip and replace.

Show me impact before a pilot

• Pick one program metric fewer physical tests energy per run or time to decision. We will outline a workflow and expected change in the first meeting.

Metrics that show progress

• Reply rate 5 to 10 percent for targeted senior lists

• First meeting rate two to four percent of contacted accounts

• Conversion from 1st to 2nd meeting: 50 to 70 % when a concrete workflow is shown

‍

‍